Skip to content
IPIUniting Diversity
A cracked dry riverbed curving toward a storm-lit horizon.

Strategic Plan 2026–2029

A realistic plan, honest about the pace a young organisation can sustain.

To strengthen community resilience and improve the knowledge and socio-economic wellbeing of vulnerable populations — especially women, children and displaced communities — through integrated, sustainable and locally driven interventions.

Period

2026–2029

Phases

03

Objectives

05

Named risks

03

Implementation phasing

Three years, in the order these things actually work.

Foundations before scale, and scale before handover. Attempting them in any other order is how young organisations over-promise and under-deliver — and it is the failure mode this plan is written to avoid.

Hands setting a foundation stone into dry earth at sunrise.
Year One

2026

Organisation & Capacity Building

Put the institutional foundations in place and prove the model at small scale before asking anyone to fund it larger.

  • Institutional strengthening and policy development
  • Pilot small-scale livelihood, education and health awareness activities
  • Strengthen partnerships and cluster engagement
  • Establish the MEL system and baseline indicators
A young mango tree photographed from below through its leaves.
Year Two

2027–2028

Programme Expansion & Consolidation

Scale what demonstrably worked, into communities that asked for it.

  • Scale up successful pilots to additional communities
  • Strengthen women-led agribusiness initiatives
  • Increase IPI visibility and donor engagement
  • Deepen consortium arrangements with national and international partners
A cultivated field in full growth with a village in the middle distance.
Year Three

2029

Sustainability & Impact

Hand ownership to the communities and structures that will still be there afterwards.

  • Consolidate community ownership of programmes
  • Strengthen monitoring, learning and documentation of impact
  • Position IPI for medium-to-large scale funding opportunities
  • Publish evidence of what changed, including where results fell short

Cross-cutting

Applied to every programme, without exception.

Gender equality & social inclusion

Programme design begins from who is being left out, and measures whether that changed.

Conflict sensitivity & Do No Harm

Every intervention is assessed for how it interacts with existing tensions before it begins.

Community participation & ownership

Structures are built to outlast our presence and our funding cycles.

Partnerships

Working with government, civil society, UN agencies and development partners rather than around them.

Sustainability & environmental responsibility

Environmental impact is treated as a programme outcome, not an externality.

Monitoring, evaluation & learning

Measurement proportionate to our size — and designed to grow.

IPI is building a simple but effective monitoring, evaluation and learning system — deliberately proportionate to the organisation's current size, and designed to grow with it.

01

Track progress against objectives

Each strategic objective carries defined outputs and indicators, reviewed against baseline.

02

Document lessons and best practice

Including what did not work — programme learning is only useful if it is honest.

03

Ensure accountability

To communities first, then to partners and donors. Annual reviews inform adaptive programming.

Risk management

What could stop this, and what we do about it.

Naming risk plainly is part of being fundable. These are the three that matter most in IPI's operating context.

R01

Funding constraints

Mitigation

Diversified partnerships and funding sources; consortium arrangements; programme design that degrades gracefully at lower budgets.

R02

Insecurity and political instability

Mitigation

Conflict-sensitive approaches and Do No Harm assessment before every intervention; deep community engagement that gives programmes local legitimacy.

R03

Climate shocks and flooding

Mitigation

Flexible programming and seasonal planning; environmental conservation built into health programming rather than treated separately.

As a young national organisation, IPI's strategy is deliberately built around partnership. Consortium arrangements let IPI contribute what it holds — community access, local legitimacy and conflict-sensitive delivery in hard-to-reach areas — while drawing on partners for technical capacity and funding scale.

Period

2026–2029

Phases

03

Objectives

05